Exploring the associations of career transition components with adolescents’ career decision-making self-efficacy and anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The transition from high school to college is crucial for adolescents' identity, responsibilities, and career choices and may shape adolescents' lives. This study aims to explore the mediating role of career transition components-situation, self, and support-on the relationship between career decision-making self-efficacy and career anxiety among adolescents. METHODS: A structural equation modeling approach was employed with participants from senior high schools (n = 806) from various schools in Istanbul, Türkiye. Data were collected using standardized scales measuring career decision-making self-efficacy, career transition components, and career anxiety. To assess mediation effects, Pearson correlation and path analysis were used. RESULTS: Career decision-making self-efficacy was positively correlated with career transition components and negatively correlated with career anxiety. The study found evidence of indirect pathways-consistent with partial mediation-via situation and support (β = .384 and .469, respectively), whereas the self-component was not significant. After removing the self-factor, overall model fit improved, suggesting that external situational elements and support systems are more closely associated with lower career anxiety during this transition. CONCLUSION: This study is one of the first to apply Schlossberg's Transition Theory to non-Western adolescent career transitions, providing insights beyond Western paradigms. The Turkish sample-characterized by its collectivist cultural orientation, high university entrance pressure, and diverse schooling system-illuminates how socio-cultural and structural factors influence career development differently. Culturally relevant interventions to reduce career anxiety and improve decision-making self-efficacy in adolescents in similar circumstances can benefit from these findings.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.