Environmental Enrichment and Forced-Exposure Training With Pigeons: Responding to the Replication Crisis

Abstract

Recent attention to the reliability of scientific literature has focused renewed attention on the role of replications. The present study aimed to evaluate 2 variables that appear to affect suboptimal choice in pigeons but have yet to be replicated. Pigeons were presented with a standard suboptimal choice task in which the suboptimal alternative led to a signaled delivery of food 50% of the time and the optimal alternative always led to food. The type of housing (enriched vs. isolated) and type of training (presence vs. absence of forced-exposure trials) was manipulated. Based on previous research, pigeons housed in isolation and trained with forced-exposure trials were predicted to make the most suboptimal choices of the four groups. Instead, birds in enriched housing and trained with forced-exposure trials chose the suboptimal alternative most frequently. A balanced 2 x 2 ANOVA found that both the main effect of housing, F(1, 8) = 4.52, p = .066, ω2 = .18, and training, F(1, 8) = 5.21, p = .052, ω2 = .22, did not reach significance, nor did their interaction, F(1, 8) = 0.37, p = .562, ω2 < .01. However, Bayes factors indicated weak evidence in support of both the main effect of housing (BF10 = 1.22) and the main effect of training (BF10 = 1.46), but not the interaction (BF10 = 0.5). The present results highlight the need to determine the degree to which initial results are reliable and generalizable prior to becoming cited and viewed as an established finding.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 0 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.