SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A step-by-step guide for conducting an umbrella review
16 references·1 citing·44 second hop
A step-by-step guide for conducting an umbrella review (2025)A step-by-step guide for conducting an um…Conducting umbrella reviews (2022)Conducting umbrella reviewsManaging overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews (2021)Managing overlap of primary s…Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial (2020)Single-reviewer abstract scre…Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Single screening versus conve…Examining overlap of included studies in meta‐reviews: Guidance for using the corrected covered area index (2019)Examining overlap of included…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Systematic review automation …Product Review: Covidence (Systematic Review Software) (2014)Product Review: Covidence (Sy…Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies (2013)Overlapping meta-analyses on …Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Methodology in conducting a s…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records (2002)Identification of randomized …Umbrella Reviews: Concepts, Methodological Frameworks, and Step‐by‐Step Implementation (2025)Umbrella Reviews: Concepts, M…Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview (2014)An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness (2017)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them (2020)Prevalence of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness (2024)Prevalence of mental disorders in young refugees and asylum seekers in European Countries: a systematic review (2018)A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions focused on improving social support and/ mental health outcomes of survivors (2020)The Role of Social Determinants of Health in Cardiovascular Diseases: An Umbrella Review (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2011Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions1,227 cited
  • 2014Product Review: Covidence (Systematic Review Software)718 cited
  • 2019Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review625 cited
  • 2014Systematic review automation technologies471 cited
  • 2019Examining overlap of included studies in meta‐reviews: Guidance for using the corrected covered area index345 cited
  • 2002Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records340 cited
  • 2022Conducting umbrella reviews322 cited
  • 2021

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews
252 cited
  • 2013Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies248 cited
  • 2020Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial206 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Umbrella Reviews: Concepts, Methodological Frameworks, and Step‐by‐Step Implementation14 cited