SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia
16 references·0 citing·42 second hop
The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia (2025)The publish or perish, publish and perish…Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Papers and patents are becomi…The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for …The natural selection of bad science (2016)The natural selection of bad …Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Academic Research in the 21st…Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Growth rates of modern scienc…Publish or perish: Where are we heading? (2014)Publish or perish: Where are …Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer (2014)Publication bias in the socia…Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Increasing value and reducing…Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Do Pressures to Publish Incre…Publish or perish: a systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates (2006)Publish or perish: a systemat…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Philosophical Explanations. (1983)Philosophical Explanations.The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The file drawer problem and t…That's Interesting! (1971)That's Interesting!The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Matthew effect in science…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew Effect in ScienceNetworks of Scientific Papers (1965)Scientific peer review (2011)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)“Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI (2021)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)The Generalizability of Survey Experiments (2015)A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management (2017)Artifact in behavioral research (1969)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery (1961)The Scientific Community. (1966)Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy (1986)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. (1995)Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications (1999)Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance1 (1999)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments (1986)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas (2023)Serious Games and Gamification in Healthcare: A Meta-Review (2023)Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)Folk Psychology as Simulation (1986)The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost (1996)A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.9,043 cited
  • 1968The Matthew Effect in Science6,700 cited
  • 1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
  • 1983Philosophical Explanations.2,039 cited
  • 2014Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis1,597 cited
  • 2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references1,570 cited
  • 2014Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer1,539 cited
  • 1971That's Interesting!1,216 cited
  • 2023Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time896 cited
  • 2016The natural selection of bad science858 cited
  • 2010Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data804 cited
  • 2016Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition685 cited
  • 2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity545 cited
  • 2006Publish or perish: a systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

524 cited
  • 2014Publish or perish: Where are we heading?386 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.