References

• 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,163 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
• 2020Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline4,561 cited
• 2020JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis4,162 cited
• 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
• 2008Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses1,795 cited
• 2022Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement849 cited
• 2017Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect700 cited
• 2014A checklist designed to aid consistency and reproducibility of GRADE assessments: development and pilot validation612 cited
• 2020GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy408 cited
• 2020GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables389 cited
• 2019Umbrella reviews: what they are and why we need them201 cited
• 2015An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews181 cited