SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evidence synthesis strategies and indications for scoping and systematic reviews: A methodological guide and recommendations for radiography research
16 references·0 citing·42 second hopsampled
Evidence synthesis strategies and indications for scoping and systematic reviews: A methodological guide and recommendations for radiography research (2025)Evidence synthesis strategies and indicat…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the…Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidan…Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Literature review as a resear…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Qualitative research synthesis (2015)Qualitative research synthesisBeyond PICO (2012)Beyond PICOQUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)Critical evaluation of the Ne…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Methods for the thematic synt…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)How should meta‐regression an…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data (2000)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2002)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (1986)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Qualitative research : theory, method and practice (1997)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Are healthcare workers’ intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? a systematic review (2013)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies (2017)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution (2023)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review (2020)The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? (2020)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation45,728 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework37,853 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews27,008 cited
  • 2010Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses17,486 cited
  • 2019Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines16,035 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews14,564 cited
  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,549 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,859 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies11,662 cited
  • 2008Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews11,463 cited
  • 2020Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews8,316 cited
  • 2021PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews4,191 cited
  • 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
  • 2012Beyond PICO

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2,676 cited
  • 2015Qualitative research synthesis2,608 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.