SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Postdigital Peer Review: A Vulnerable Space Between Freedom and Responsibility
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Postdigital Peer Review: A Vulnerable Space Between Freedom and Responsibility (2025)Postdigital Peer Review: A Vulnerable Spa…The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)The replication crisis has le…Is the future of peer review automated? (2022)Is the future of peer review …Collective Writing: The Continuous Struggle for Meaning-Making (2022)Collective Writing: The Conti…Postdigital: A Term That Sucks but Is Useful (2021)Postdigital: A Term That Suck…AI-assisted peer review (2021)AI-assisted peer reviewThe limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)The limitations to our unders…Meet this super-spotter of duplicated images in science papers (2020)Meet this super-spotter of du…China’s Internationalized Higher Education During Covid-19: Collective Student Autoethnography (2020)China’s Internationalized Hig…The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education (2019)The Dangerous Rise of Therape…Is peer review in academic publishing still working? (2018)Is peer review in academic pu…How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive academic writing (2nd ed.). (2018)How to write a lot: A practic…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewPlanned Obsolescence (2011)Planned ObsolescenceThe ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature (2010)The ethics of scholarly peer …Thinking Collaboratively about the Peer-Review Process for Journal-Article Publication (2005)Thinking Collaboratively abou…Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Chance and Consensus in Peer …Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Attitudes of Journal Editors to Nonnative Speaker Contributions (2001)Different Patterns of Duplicate Publication (2004)The language of science (2004)Early career researchers: Scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change (2017)Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers (2017)Supporting student and teacher feedback literacy: an instructional model for student feedback processes (2021)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots (2023)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The structural transformation of the public sphere (2006)Autoethnography: An Overview (2010)China’s higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: some preliminary observations (2020)Practices, Challenges, and Prospects of Online Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic in Higher Education: Lecturer Perspectives (2020)The Effects of COVID-19 on Early Childhood Education and Care: Research and Resources for Children, Families, Teachers, and Teacher Educators (2021)Big Data's Disparate Impact (2014)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process (2021)Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance (2023)The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future (2024)The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)International multi‐stakeholder consensus statement on clinical trial integrity (2023)Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved (2023)Meta‐analysis prediction intervals are under reported in sport and exercise medicine (2024)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary (2024)A manifesto for a globally diverse, equitable, and inclusive open science (2025)Data Quality in the Age of AI: A Review of Governance, Ethics, and the FAIR Principles (2025)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)Good education in an age of measurement: on the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education (2008)Cultural capital and agency: connecting critique and curriculum in higher education (2011)From ‘therapeutic’ to political education: the centrality of affective sensibility in critical pedagogy (2011)Credit, time, and personality: The human challenges to sharing scholarly work using Web 2.0 (2012)“Words with Friends”: Socially Networked Reading onGoodreads (2013)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
  • 2020The limitations to our understanding of peer review383 cited
  • 2021AI-assisted peer review284 cited
  • 2019The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education237 cited
  • 2020China’s Internationalized Higher Education During Covid-19: Collective Student Autoethnography191 cited
  • 2011Planned Obsolescence137 cited
  • 2023The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes137 cited
  • 2010The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature84 cited
  • 2022Is the future of peer review automated?80 cited
  • 2021Postdigital: A Term That Sucks but Is Useful66 cited
  • 2022Collective Writing: The Continuous Struggle for Meaning-Making49 cited
  • 2020Meet this super-spotter of duplicated images in science papers47 cited
  • 2005Thinking Collaboratively about the Peer-Review Process for Journal-Article Publication44 cited
  • 2018How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive academic writing (2nd ed.).42 cited
  • 2018Is peer review in academic publishing still working?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

38 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.