SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Accelerating the pace and accuracy of systematic reviews using AI: a validation study
16 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Accelerating the pace and accuracy of systematic reviews using AI: a validation study (2025)Accelerating the pace and accuracy of sys…Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions (2023)Harnessing the Power of ChatG…Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature (2023)Artificial intelligence to au…Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)Artificial intelligence in sy…Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? (2023)Are ChatGPT and large languag…Application ChatGPT in conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2023)Application ChatGPT in conduc…Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review (2022)Using artificial intelligence…Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)Tools to support the automati…An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)An open source machine learni…Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Toward systematic review auto…Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study (2018)Prioritising references for s…Finding better active learners for faster literature reviews (2018)Finding better active learner…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Interrater reliability: the k…Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center (2012)Deploying an interactive mach…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Estimating Time to Conduct a Meta-analysis From Number of Citations Retrieved (1999)Estimating Time to Conduct a …Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Meta‐analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how? (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Psychological Distress in Refugee Children: A Systematic Review (2010)The Influence of the Therapist-Patient Relationship on Treatment Outcome in Physical Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review (2010)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)School Closures During Social Lockdown and Mental Health, Health Behaviors, and Well-being Among Children and Adolescents During the First COVID-19 Wave (2022)Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study (2023)Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study (2024)How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools (2024)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research (2016)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Here, There and Everywhere: On the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Management Research and the Peer‐Review Process (2024)Generative artificial intelligence use in evidence synthesis: A systematic review (2025)Using artificial intelligence for systematic review: the example of elicit (2025)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017)ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, SciSpace and Wolfram versus higher education assessments: an updated multi-institutional study of the academic integrity impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on assessment, teaching and learning in engineering (2024)Evaluating the effectiveness of large language models in abstract screening: a comparative analysis (2024)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools (2018)Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2019)Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use—a scoping review (2025)The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2012Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic19,799 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement1,987 cited
  • 2021An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews1,149 cited
  • 2019Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis635 cited
  • 2012Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center530 cited
  • 2023Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used245 cited
  • 2022Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review222 cited
  • 2023Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation?206 cited
  • 2023Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions201 cited
  • 2021Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review189 cited
  • 2023Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature169 cited
  • 1999Estimating Time to Conduct a Meta-analysis From Number of Citations Retrieved163 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study
148 cited
  • 2018Finding better active learners for faster literature reviews83 cited
  • 2023Application ChatGPT in conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses62 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.