SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Strategizing AI utilization for psychological literature screening: A comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms and key factors to consider
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Strategizing AI utilization for psychological literature screening: A comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms and key factors to consider (2025)Strategizing AI utilization for psycholog…Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching (2022)Citationchaser: A tool for tr…Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)Tools to support the automati…Domain-specific prior knowledge and learning: A meta-analysis (2021)Domain-specific prior knowled…An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)An open source machine learni…A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning (2021)A Survey on Bias and Fairness…Sleep and suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies (2020)Sleep and suicide: A systemat…Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews (2020)Error rates of human reviewer…Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Toward systematic review auto…Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Meta-analysis and the science…Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Growth rates of modern scienc…Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center (2012)Deploying an interactive mach…Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews (2010)Semi-automated screening of b…Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification (2005)Reducing Workload in Systemat…What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. (1992)What do data really mean? Res…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task (1960)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)The natural selection of bad science (2016)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences (2002)Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis (2003)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2015)Modeling annotation time to reduce workload in comparative effectiveness reviews (2010)What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018)The development of software to support multiple systematic review types (2018)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism. (1972)Fairness through awareness (2012)Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification (2018)Algorithmic Bias in Education (2021)Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation (2023)Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (2023)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study (2023)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching: the TARCiS statement (2024)How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comprehensive step-by-step guide (2024)The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies6,614 cited
  • 2021A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning6,499 cited
  • 2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references1,799 cited
  • 2018Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis1,714 cited
  • 2021An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews1,237 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
  • 2019Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis647 cited
  • 2022Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching603 cited
  • 1992What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology.573 cited
  • 2012Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center535 cited
  • 2005Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification410 cited
  • 2010Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews356 cited
  • 2021Domain-specific prior knowledge and learning: A meta-analysis258 cited
  • 2020Sleep and suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

239 cited
  • 2020Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews234 cited
  • 2021Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review214 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.