A DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION OF THE MYERS‐BRIGGS TYPE INDICATOR

Abstract

Errata Page 21, the 19th line, the first phrase should read 1!.63 for E-1." Page 25, the first sentence should read "One of the Indicator correlations with the criteria was significant for Cal.Tech.---theJ-P scale correlated .14 with overunder achievement.I! Page 33, the second paragraph should read nOn the EPPS, the E-I scale correlated positively with the Exh, Aff, Dam, and Chg scales and negatively with the Ach, Def, and Aba scales.The S-N scale correlated positively with the Def and Ord scales and negatively vnth the Ach and Aut scales.The T-F scale correlated positively ',nth the Ach, Ord, Aut, Dam, ehg, and End scales, and negatively with the Aff, Sue, Aba, Nur, and Het scales.The J-P scale correlated positively with the Def, Ord, and End scales and negatively 1,lith the Exh, Aut, Chg, Het, 8..'1.dAgg scales.11 Page 34, the first line, the first phrase should read "l•ff, Ma, and Pt.II Page 51, the second sentence should read "There were only four significant (p<.05) correlations with the clinical scales, which might be expected by chance because of the large number of significance tests (80) applied to the Indicatorclinical scale correlations.II Page 51, the fifth sentence should read "In addition, the K scale correlated positj.velyT,Jith the dichotomous indeterminacy measure and the F scale correlated positively 'l-T1 th the continuous indeterminacy measure.II Page 91, Table 6, the entry for' the phi eoefficient betvleen T-F and ,J-P for the male high school students should be II .13g>~II• Page 94, Table 8, a corrected copy of the second section of this table is attached.-2-Page 103, Table 16, the entry for the phi coefficient between the Indicator and the Gray-Wheelwright E-I scales should be 11.63-ll-*1I.Page 108, Table 21, the entry for the correlation between the J-P scale and over-under achievement at Cal. Tech.should be 11 .14~l-1I .Page 113, Table 25, the entry for the proportion remaining of clerical employees in the S type classification should be ".53".Page 127, Table 33, the entry for the correlation between the S-N scale and the Het scale should be 11_.06". 2 Page 135, Table 37, the X entry for the difference in S-N type classifications between the College Prep.Boys and the General-Vocational Boys should be tr52.O~Hl-ll.Page lL~8, Table 49, the F entry for the T-:F' scale in the male arithmetic reasoning test regression should be "1.75 1 ' .Page 151, Table 52, the entry for the difference between the correlations wi th GPA for the J and P students should be 11.21tr .Page 157, Table 55, the entry for the correlation between the T-F continuous indeterminacy measure and Hy should be 11.1}l(_11 and the entry for the correlation between the J-P continuous indeterminacy measure and F should be tr .1:Yl<-".

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 37 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.