SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Randomisierte kontrollierte und kontrollierte klinische Studien in der Zeitschrift „Der Chirurg“
16 references·1 citing·33 second hop
Randomisierte kontrollierte und kontrollierte klinische Studien in der Zeitschrift „Der Chirurg“ (2006)Randomisierte kontrollierte und kontrolli…Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials (2006)Lead editorial: Trials – usin…Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey (2005)Optimal search strategies for…Evaluating Meta-analyses in the General Surgical Literature (2005)Evaluating Meta-analyses in t…Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey (2004)Optimal search strategies for…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Identifying Clinical Trials in the Medical Literature with Electronic Databases (2000)Identifying Clinical Trials i…A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies. (2000)A systematic review of compar…Bias against European journals in medical publication databases (1999)Bias against European journal…Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Language bias in randomised c…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews (1996)Completeness of reporting of …Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasSystematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…The Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials in the Field of Surgery: Studies on Laparoscopic versus Open Appendectomy as an Example (2009)The Quality of Randomized Cli…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Model Transparency and Validation (2012)Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. (2015)Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies (2016)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
  • 2004Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey547 cited
  • 1996Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews538 cited
  • 2005Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey439 cited
  • 2000A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies.311 cited
  • 2000Identifying Clinical Trials in the Medical Literature with Electronic Databases181 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2005Evaluating Meta-analyses in the General Surgical Literature129 cited
  • 1999Bias against European journals in medical publication databases66 cited
  • 2006Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials33 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2009The Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials in the Field of Surgery: Studies on Laparoscopic versus Open Appendectomy as an Example8 cited