SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting Research: A Biologist's Guide to Articles, Talks, and Posters
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Reporting Research: A Biologist's Guide to Articles, Talks, and Posters (2014)Reporting Research: A Biologist's Guide t…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…The mismeasurement of science (2007)The mismeasurement of scienceWhy Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Open access publishing takes off (2004)Open access publishing takes …A meeting with Enrico Fermi (2004)A meeting with Enrico FermiParachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials (2003)Parachute use to prevent deat…‘ROSALIND FRANKLIN, THE DARK LADY OF DNA’ (2003)‘ROSALIND FRANKLIN, THE DARK …Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Peer Review in Health SciencesFashionable nonsense: postmodern intellectuals' abuse of science (1999)Fashionable nonsense: postmod…The language instinct : the new science of language and mind (1995)The language instinct : the n…The Science of Scientific Writing (1990)The Science of Scientific Wri…How to write and publish a scientific paper (1990)How to write and publish a sc…A Dictionary of Modern English Usage (1966)A Dictionary of Modern Englis…A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. (1957)A Manual for Writers of Term …Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace (1983)A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models (2006)The ODD protocol: A review and first update (2010)The ODD Protocol for Describing Agent-Based and Other Simulation Models: A Second Update to Improve Clarity, Replication, and Structural Realism (2020)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)11 Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field’s Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge Through Syntheses (2008)Why We Need Qualitative Research in Suicidology (2010)Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study (2012)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The New Statistics (2013)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty (1998)Natural Justice (2005)Embers of society: Firelight talk among the Ju/’hoansi Bushmen (2014)The rhetoric of citation systems—Part II: Competing epistemic values in citation (1999)Marketing Yourself in the Competitive Job Market: An Innovative Course Preparing Undergraduates for Marketing Careers (2003)Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited (2008)An Anthropology of Knowledge (2002)On the First Law of Geography: A Reply (2004)Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy (2007)Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles (2001)Authority and invisibility (2002)Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2003Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials1,155 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 1995The language instinct : the new science of language and mind593 cited
  • 1990How to write and publish a scientific paper569 cited
  • 1999Fashionable nonsense: postmodern intellectuals' abuse of science469 cited
  • 1957A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations.350 cited
  • 1990The Science of Scientific Writing338 cited
  • 2004A meeting with Enrico Fermi321 cited
  • 2004Open access publishing takes off299 cited
  • 2007The mismeasurement of science296 cited
  • 2003‘ROSALIND FRANKLIN, THE DARK LADY OF DNA’270 cited
  • 1999Peer Review in Health Sciences268 cited
  • 1966A Dictionary of Modern English Usage

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

244 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.