Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Citizens, courts, and confirmations: positivity theory and the judgments of the American people

1 references·16 citing·46 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2001Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review365 cited

Cited by

2018Media Coverage and Public Approval of the U.S. Supreme Court102 cited
2017Shifting Legal Visions: Judicial Change and Human Rights Trials in Latin America95 cited
2013Backlash and Legitimation: Macro Political Responses to Supreme Court Decisions81 cited
2015Unilateral Powers, Public Opinion, and the Presidency75 cited
2009“New-Style” Judicial Campaigns and the Legitimacy of State High Courts71 cited
2015Issue-Specific Opinion Change67 cited
2011Going Public When Opinion Is Contested: Evidence from Presidents' Campaigns for Supreme Court Nominees, 1930‐200965 cited
2016Change in Institutional Support for the US Supreme Court64 cited
2019How Political Contestation Over Judicial Nominations Polarizes Americans’ Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court64 cited
2019Does Public Support for Judicial Power Depend on Who is in Political Power? Testing a Theory of Partisan Alignment in Africa62 cited
2010“An Appeal to the People”: Public Opinion and Congressional Support for the Supreme Court58 cited
2011Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making55 cited
2015Legitimacy Is for Losers: The Interconnections of Institutional Legitimacy, Performance Evaluations, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

52 cited

2013Ideological Proximity and Support for The Supreme Court51 cited

2010The Effects of Judicial Campaign Activity on the Legitimacy of Courts45 cited

2013Electing judges: the surprising effects of campaigning on judicial legitimacy41 cited