Article2013

To PLS or Not to PLS: That is the Question

Arun Rai · Dale L. Goodhue · Jörg Henseler · Ronald L. Thompson

7 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Technology Adoption and User Behaviour Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Information Systems Theories and Implementation

Abstract

PLS is used quite widely in the MIS field, but some evidence questioning its efficacy is mounting, at least in the eyes of the nays. In this panel we bring together advocates of multiple perspectives of the debate, to lay the evidence on the table and to vigorously explore the various points of view.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.

References

2003User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1 2011PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet 2014Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations 2010A Comparison of Approaches for the Analysis of Interaction Effects Between Latent Variables Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling 2012Rethinking Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: In Praise of Simple Methods 2012Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly 2013A Critical Examination of Common Beliefs About Partial Least Squares Path Modeling 2012Does PLS have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data?

Cited by

2014The Effects of Chance Correlations on Partial Least Squares Path Modeling

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.