Discourse Competence — Evidence from Thematic Development in Native and Non-Native Texts

Abstract

This paper explores the concept of discourse competence in the light of academic journal articles written by native and non-native writers of English and native-language writers of Finnish. The aim is to demystify the notion of discourse construction ability and to show that at least some of this is a matter of largely language-specific skills, which constitute an integral part of knowing how to use a language. The logical progression of a text is therefore not a straightforward reflection of a writer's ability of think clearly, but a product of culture and the textual resources of a language. The focus is on theme - rheme progression in texts, and the results indicate that this progression is more difficult to handle in a foreign language than in the mother tongue, even if grammatical errors are ignored. The implications are that we should make allowances for text-level problems just as we do for sentence-level errors in texts written in a foreign language, and in addition, we should develop teaching pratices which enable writers to construct good texts in any language

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 61 citations exist upstream.