The systematic analysis of advanced capitalist economies has had two main focuses. One has been the welfare state : this owes much to the work of Esping-Andersen in distinguishing three welfare state patterns in advanced economies (Esping-Andersen, this volume; Stephens, Huber, and Ray this volume). His distinctions have been widely accepted. There is less agreement in the analysis of the other main focus – and the focus of this chapter – production regimes ; Hall (this volume) relates the discussion in this chapter to other approaches, notably of Sabel and of Hollingsworth and Streeck. The concluding section of this book sketches links between the classification of production regimes advanced here and that of welfare states (Kitschelt, Marks, and Stephens, this volume). By a production regime is meant the organization of production through markets and market-related institutions. It analyzes the ways in which the microagents of capitalist systems – companies, customers, employees, owners of capital – organize and structure their interrelationships, within a framework of incentives and constraints or “rules of the game” set by a range of market-related institutions within which the microagents are embedded. These framework incentives and constraints are sometimes summarized as the “institutional framework” of the production side of the economy. The most important of the institutions contributing to the institutional framework are the financial system , the industrial relations system , the education and training system , and the intercompany system (the latter governing relations between companies – competition policy, technology transfer, standard setting, and so on).
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 953 citations exist upstream.