PSYCHOLOGISM AND THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN DISCOVERY AND JUSTIFICATION

Volker Peckhaus

8 citations0/0 files storedKluwer Academic Publishers eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy, Science, and History Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations

Abstract

There is a certain analogy between the discovery–justification distinction (DJ distinction) in the philosophy of science and the genesis–validity distinction in epistemology and the foundational discourse in logic.1 The investigation of this analogy may reveal the tight relation between Hans Reichenbach’s famous distinction and earlier modes of argument in foundational debates in post- and neo-Kantian times.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Kritik der reinen Vernunft 2023A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive 1935Logik der Forschung.1846A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive, being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation.1939Experience and Prediction.1988Phänomenologie des Geistes 1926Franz Brentano: Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt.1978An intellectual autobiography

Cited by

2021Abduction, the Logic of Scientific Creativity, and Scientific Realism

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.