No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Recently, Prosecco wine industry has dramatically increased. Wine producers were able to exploit successfully opportunities coming from both the supply growth and consumer appreciation (Boatto et al., 2008; Boatto et al., 2009). More recently, this success has been accomplished \nby an increasing competition on both domestic and international markets. In July 2009, the geographical denomination Prosecco (DO) has been strongly reformed: i) the Prosecco area has been unambiguously de_ned by introducing a new DOC (controlled DO) while the previous one has been replaced by the DOCG (controlled and guaranteed DO); ii) the name Prosecco has also been restricted to wine coming from that area only. This reform is supposed to further protect the value of Prosecco brand; however, dangerous threats have arisen since the Prosecco area \nhave been signi_cantly extended and the management of DOs is not yet clear. Theoretically, the theory of Clubs may give some hints in managing DOCG while the enforcement through a central authority may be the exit strategy for the management of new DOC. In this paper both hypothesis have been investigated. Results of NCP analysis con_rm the signi_cance of the Club for DOCG producers while forecasts about the increasing supply production and e_ects on prices are consistent with the tragedy of commons scenario. Eventually, the change in DOs should be accomplished by actions safeguarding the value of Prosecco as collective brand.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.