The Form of Practical Knowledge

Stephen Engstrom

352 citations0/0 files storedHarvard University Press eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations Philosophical Ethics and Theory Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Abstract

Immanuel Kant’s claim that the categorical imperative of morality is based in practical reason has long been a source of puzzlement and doubt, even for sympathetic interpreters. Engstrom provides an illuminating new interpretation of the categorical imperative, arguing that we have exaggerated and misconceived Kant’s break with tradition.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 352 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2018Kant on Reflection and Virtue 2011‘Making up Your Mind’ and the Activity of Reason 2017Kant on cognition and knowledge 2018Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics 2010Kant on the Right to Freedom: A Defense 2017Kant on the place of cognition in the progression of our representations 2020On the Transcendental Freedom of the Intellect 2019Kant: constitutivism as capacities-first philosophy

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.