Radicals in robes: why extreme right-wing courts are wrong for America

Unknown author

95 citations0/0 files storedChoice Reviews Online

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Judicial and Constitutional Studies American Constitutional Law and Politics Law, Rights, and Freedoms

Abstract

Praised as a must-have primer during the Roberts and Alito hearings, Radicals in Robes offers a rigorous yet accessible analysis of what's at stake in the judiciary choices made during these warring days of the Warren/Rehnquist legacy. Radicals in Robes pulls away the veil of rhetoric from a dangerous and radical movement and issues a strong and passionate warning about what conservatives really intend.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 95 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2013A Revisionist History of Regulatory Capture 20105 Judges as Members of Small Groups 20101 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry 2010Constituição, Democracia e Supremacia Judicial: Direito e Política no Brasil Contemporâneo 2010Abortion Politics in Congress: Strategic Incrementalism and Policy Change 20103 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning 2011Libertarian Paternalism, Externalities, and the “Spirit of Liberty”: How Thaler and Sunstein Are Nudging Us toward an “Overlapping Consensus”. Richard H. Thaler, and Cass R. Sunstein. 2008 . Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Pp. x + 293. $26.00 cloth.20102 Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.