Mapping the Lonely Landscape - Assessing Loneliness and Its Consequences

Niina Junttila · Sakari Kainulainen · Juho Saari

35 citations0/0 files storedThe Open Psychology Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Health disparities and outcomes Attachment and Relationship Dynamics Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Abstract

The subjective nature of loneliness poses challenges for valid and reliable assessment methods - what should we ask when we want to evaluate one´s loneliness? Therefore, this study aimed to compare loneliness assessed by different indicators: frequency of loneliness over the last year, number of good friends, satisfaction with existing social relationships, and the short version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. These indicators were used to study the gender and age-related differences between lonely and non-lonely adults and as predictors for the self-reported consequences of loneliness. The sample consisted of 17,258 Finnish adults aged 30 to 60 years. Based on our results, the number of good friends had less power as an indicator for the self-reported negative consequences of loneliness than did the other indicators (i.e., satisfaction with existing personal relationships and resultant [based on confirmatory factor analysis] social and emotional loneliness factors of the UCLA Loneliness Scale). The importance of identifying loneliness in the prevention of psychosocial and economic issues, substance abuse and eating disorders, and negative consequences on health is discussed. More broadly, based on our results, we find that there is a legitimate reason to consider loneliness as a form of social inequality.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives 1990Comparative fit indexes in structural models.1990Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach 1973A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis 1996UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure 1996The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis.1980The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence.2010Loneliness Matters: A Theoretical and Empirical Review of Consequences and Mechanisms

Cited by

2017Loneliness and friendships among eight‐year‐old children: time‐trends over a 24‐year period 2020Perceived poverty, perceived income adequacy and loneliness in Israeli young adults: Are social capital and neighbourhood capital resilience factors?2018Multidimensional and fluctuating experiences of loneliness from childhood to young adulthood in Northern Finland

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.