Human rights, serious crime, and criminal procedure

Abstract

Contents include: I Why Bother With Rights When Safety is at Risk?: introduction the value of accuracy process values and legitimacy exploring procedural fairness conflicting goals, conflicting pressures. II The Strasbourg Court and the British Response to Strasbourg: the early years safety and Article 6 British courts and the the strength of public interest arguments human rights and the critics. III Taking a Balanced View of the Public Interest: greater safeguards for serious crime developing a human rights culture no rights without responsibilities rights and risk avoiding human rights war, fights and the relegation of human rights.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.