Book2011

Evidentialism and its Discontents

184 citations0/0 files storedOxford University Press eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies Educational Strategies and Epistemologies

Abstract

In this book, leading epistemologists challenge and refine evidentialism, the view that epistemic justification for belief is determined solely by considerations pertaining to one's evidence. Earl Conee and Richard Feldman, the leading advocates of evidentialism, respond to each essay in this engaging and illuminating debate.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 184 citations exist upstream.

References

1962Knowledge and belief 2003Knowledge and Lotteries 2008Knowledge and Action 2005CONTEXTUALISM, SUBJECT-SENSITIVE INVARIANTISM AND KNOWLEDGE OF KNOWLEDGE 1966Knowledge--by examples

Cited by

2015Normativity without Cartesian privilege 2011Rational self-doubt and the failure of closure 2013Experience and Evidence 2020The Transmission of Knowledge 2018A Combinatorial Argument against Practical Reasons for Belief 2016ON THE EPISTEMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF EVIDENCE YOU SHOULD HAVE HAD 2013Williamson on Gettier Cases and Epistemic Logic 2014VARIETIES OF EXTERNALISM

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.