Article2006

:Shades of Difference: Mythologies of Skin Color in Early Modern England

46 citations0/0 files storedSixteenth Century Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Renaissance Literature and Culture Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism Literature: history, themes, analysis

Abstract

Was there such a thing as a modern notion of race in the English Renaissance, and, if so, was skin color its necessary marker? In fact, early modern texts described human beings of various national origins-including English-as turning white, brown, tawny, black, green, or red for any number of reasons, from the effects of the sun's rays or imbalance of the bodily humors to sexual desire or the application of makeup. It is in this cultural environment that the seventeenth-century London Gazette used the term black to describe both dark-skinned African runaways and dark-haired Britons, such as Scots, who are now unquestioningly conceived of as white. In Shades of Difference, Sujata Iyengar explores the cultural mythologies of skin color in a period during which colonial expansion and the slave trade introduced Britons to more dark-skinned persons than at any other time in their history. Looking to texts as divergent as sixteenth-century Elizabethan erotic verse, seventeenth-century lyrics, and Restoration prose romances, Iyengar considers the construction of race during the early modern period without oversimplifying the emergence of race as a color-coded classification or a black/white opposition. Rather, embodiment, and skin color are examined in their multiple contexts-historical, geographical, and literary. Iyengar engages works that have not previously been incorporated into discussions of the formation of race, such as Marlowe's Hero and Leander and Shakespeare's Venus and Adonis. By rethinking the emerging early modern connections between the notions of race, skin color, and gender, Shades of Difference furthers an ongoing discussion with originality and impeccable scholarship.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 46 citations exist upstream.

References

20063.2. MARXISM AND LITERATURE 1982The Population History of England 1541-1871. A Reconstruction 1990The Beauty Myth 2000The Complexion of Race 2002Staging domesticity: household work and English identity in early modern drama

Cited by

2011Reading and the History of Race in the Renaissance 2016Re-Historicizing Race, White Melancholia, and the Shakespearean Property 2016“Not a Moor exactly”: Shakespeare, Serial, and Modern Constructions of Race 2012The Global Consequences of Mistranslation: The Adoption of the “Black but …” Formulation in Europe, 1440–1650 2011First Impressions: Newspaper Advertisements and Early Modern English Body Imaging, 1651–1750 2016Courtly Connections: Anthony Sherley’s Relation of his trauels (1613) in a Global Context 2014English Republicanism and Global Slavery in Henry Neville’s The Isle of Pines 2021Was Sexuality Racialized for Shakespeare?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.