Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Refocusing the Debate: Assessing the Purposes and Tools of Teacher Evaluation

16 references·16 citing·41 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2005Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement4,499 cited
2004The Impact of Individual Teachers on Student Achievement: Evidence from Panel Data2,432 cited
1975On the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B.1,584 cited
2003On the Specification and Estimation of the Production Function for Cognitive Achievement1,513 cited
2006Teachers and Student Achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools1,292 cited
2008Estimating Teacher Impacts on Student Achievement: An Experimental Evaluation784 cited
2010Teacher Quality in Educational Production: Tracking, Decay, and Student Achievement*735 cited
2009The Widget Effect: Our National Failure to Acknowledge and Act on Differences in Teacher Effectiveness.552 cited
2004Models for Value-Added Modeling of Teacher Effects517 cited
2004On Making Determinations of Quality in Teaching498 cited
2009Measuring Up347 cited
2009The Intertemporal Variability of Teacher Effect Estimates331 cited
2006Accountability, Ability and Disability: Gaming the System?289 cited
2010A Validity Argument Approach to Evaluating Teacher Value-Added Scores269 cited
1990Strategic Pay: Aligning Organizational Strategies and Pay Systems

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

263 cited

2004A Potential Outcomes View of Value-Added Assessment in Education233 cited

Cited by

2013Teachers for the 21st Century118 cited
2018Cultivating Positive Teacher–Student Relationships: Preliminary Evaluation of the Establish–Maintain–Restore (EMR) Method112 cited
2014State and Local Efforts to Investigate the Validity and Reliability of Scores from Teacher Evaluation Systems103 cited
2018Restructuring Instructional Leadership: How Multiple-Measure Teacher Evaluation Systems Are Redefining the Role of the School Principal94 cited
2019An experimental evaluation of three teacher quality measures: Value-added, classroom observations, and student surveys76 cited
2014Common Structural Design Features of Rubrics May Represent a Threat to Validity75 cited
2015Will VAMS Reinforce the Walls of the Egg-Crate School?64 cited
2019Reform of Chinese Universities in the Context of Sustainable Development: Teacher Evaluation and Improvement Based on Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Model39 cited
2019What matters to teachers if evaluation is meant to help them improve?30 cited
2019Maintaining the Frame: Using Frame Analysis to Explain Teacher Evaluation Policy Implementation27 cited
2015An Idea Whose Time Had Come: Negotiating Teacher Evaluation Reform in New Haven, Connecticut20 cited
2019Developing the “Will”: The Relationship between Teachers’ Perceived Policy Legitimacy and Instructional Improvement12 cited
2018Principals’ Instructional Feedback Practices During Race to the Top12 cited
2020Policies That Define Instruction: A Systematic Review of States’ and Districts’ Recommendations for Evaluating Special Educators10 cited
2017‘This is my new normal’: teachers’ accounts of evaluation policy at local school board meetings9 cited
2020The Change We Cannot See: Instructional Quality and Classroom Observation in the Era of Common Core9 cited