Article2002

Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology

79 citations0/0 files storedDigital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy and Theoretical Science Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies

Abstract

Stephen Hetherington questions the orthodox view of knowledge and presents a non-absolutist theory, which offers novel solutions to many traditional epistemological puzzles. He also examines the role of intuition in epistemological thought.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 79 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2011The Gettier-illusion: Gettier-partialism and infallibilism 2024Knowledge and Justification 2005Knowing (How It Is) That P: Degrees and Qualities of Knowledge 2006Narrative Representation of Causes 2016Sosa on knowledge, judgment and guessing 2005Should We Respond to Evil with Indifference?2006Confidence in unwarranted knowledge 2016A solution to knowledge’s threshold problem

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.