Making Comparisons Count

Ruth Chang

186 citations0/0 files storedRoutledge eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Philosophical Ethics and Theory Multi-Criteria Decision Making

Abstract

This book attempts to answer two questions: Are alternatives for choice ever incomparable? and In what ways can items be compared? The arguments offered suggest that alternatives for choice no matter how different are never incomparable, and that the ways in which items can be compared are richer and more varied than commonly supposed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 186 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2004Odious Comparisons: Incommensurability, the Case Study, and “Small N's” in Sociology 2008Value Relations 2012VALUE RELATIONS REVISITED 2017Hard Choices 2021Human Dignity and Political Criticism 2016Parity, Imprecise Comparability and the Repugnant Conclusion 2025The Ethics of Conceptualization 2012Incommensurability (and Incomparability)

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.