The rise of political economy as a science: methodology and the classical economists

Abstract

Part 1 heritage: introduction - scope, purpose and limitations of this study the philosophical background - thinkers who influenceed the classical economists - Francis Bacon (1561-1626) and the philosophy of science, Rene Descartes (1596-1650) - mathematical scientist, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) - philosophizing vs. experimentation, Isaac Newton (1642-1727) - the deductive-mathematical experimental John Locke (1632-1704), epistemological uncertainty and the historical, plain method, David Hume (1711-1776) - pioneer in moral philosophy, Dugald Stewart (1753-1828) and Scottish philosophy of science, Sir John F.W. Herschel (1792-1871) - model philosopher, William Whewell (1794-1866), gentleman of science science in 18th- and 19th-century Britain - the emergence of moral philosophy, the science of man, the of analysis and synthesis, the clock metaphor, social engineering and the diffusion of economic knowledge, the birth of econometrics a short history of induction - Bacon's theory of induction, a closer look at Newton's third step, the myth of causality and its consequences, induction in the hands of the Scots, induction's heyday - Herschel, Mill and Whewell, Jevons and the decline of induction, the new approach to induction - probability theory, Karl Popper - induction as myth. Part 2 Classical economic methodology: Adam Smith and his method -the tie to Newton, departures from Newtonian the significance of the essay The History of Astronomy, typing up odds and ends - other clues to Smith's the legitimation of science in Smith's system, lessons for today's economist Malthus and Ricardo - opposing or complementary methods? - malleable scientific reputations, education and accomplishments, the methodological dialogue, significance and legacy of the Malthus-Ricardo dialogue John Stuart Mill - last of the Newtonians - the historical setting - interest in philosophy of science awakened, Mill's analysis of the methods of natural science, the development of a of social science, the inexact science of political economy, Mill on specific methodological issues in political economy, Mill's place in the history and philosophy of science concluding remarks.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 70 citations exist upstream.