Evaluating Scientific Evidence: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Intellectual Due Process

Abstract

Introduction 1. Triers of science 2. Intellectual due process 3. A framework of analysis 4. Toxic torts and the causation conundrum 5. Criminal identification evidence 6. Future dangerousness testimony: the epistemology of prediction 7. Barefoot or Daubert? A cognitive perspective on vetting future dangerousness testimony 8. Future dangerousness and sexual offenders 9. Models of rationality: evaluating social psychology 10. Evaluating battered woman syndrome Conclusion.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 99 citations exist upstream.