SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Trial Sequential Boundaries for Cumulative Meta-Analyses
8 references·3 citing·41 second hop
Trial Sequential Boundaries for Cumulative Meta-Analyses (2013)Trial Sequential Boundaries for Cumulativ…Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011)Cochrane Database of Systemat…Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses (2008)Trial sequential analysis rev…Metan: Fixed- and Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)Metan: Fixed- and Random-Effe…Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Trial sequential analysis may…Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis (2007)Practical methods for incorpo…The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2002)The Cochrane Database of Syst…Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (1998)Overcoming the limitations of…Cumulating evidence from randomized trials: Utilizing sequential monitoring boundaries for cumulative meta-analysis (1997)Cumulating evidence from rand…Using Trial Sequential Analysis for estimating the sample sizes of further trials: example using smoking cessation intervention (2020)Using Trial Sequential Analys…Optimal information size in trial sequential analysis of time-to-event outcomes reveals potentially inconclusive results because of the risk of random error (2013)Optimal information size in t…Trial sequential analysis may be insufficient to draw firm conclusions regarding statistically significant treatment differences using observed intervention effects: A case study of meta-analyses of multiple myeloma trials (2012)Trial sequential analysis may…Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Global prevalence of anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-regression (2012)Mortality in Mental Disorders and Global Disease Burden Implications (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution (2013)Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2017)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Interpreting meta-analysis according to the adequacy of sample size. An example using isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV-infected individuals (2010)The Number of Patients and Events Required to Limit the Risk of Overestimation of Intervention Effects in Meta-Analysis—A Simulation Study (2011)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses (2009)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)Trial sequential analysis has the potential to improve the reliability of conclusions in meta-analysis (2013)Estimating the standardized mean difference with minimum risk: Maximizing accuracy and minimizing cost with sequential estimation. (2016)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools (2004)A meta-analysis and model of the relationship between sleep and depression in adolescents: Recommendations for future research and clinical practice (2014)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses (2000)Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions (2011)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Major mistakes and errors in the use of Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews or meta-analyses – protocol for a systematic review (2022)Major mistakes or errors in the use of trial sequential analysis in systematic reviews or meta-analyses – the METSA systematic review (2024)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses (2012)Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of eating disorders (2014)Effects of music interventions on stress-related outcomes: a systematic review and two meta-analyses (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis6,205 cited
  • 2011Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews4,664 cited
  • 2007Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis1,879 cited
  • 2002The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews1,497 cited
  • 2008Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses1,117 cited
  • 2008Metan: Fixed- and Random-Effects Meta-Analysis1,026 cited
  • 1998Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials428 cited
  • 1997Cumulating evidence from randomized trials: Utilizing sequential monitoring boundaries for cumulative meta-analysis415 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Using Trial Sequential Analysis for estimating the sample sizes of further trials: example using smoking cessation intervention60 cited
  • 2013Optimal information size in trial sequential analysis of time-to-event outcomes reveals potentially inconclusive results because of the risk of random error32 cited
  • 2012Trial sequential analysis may be insufficient to draw firm conclusions regarding statistically significant treatment differences using observed intervention effects: A case study of meta-analyses of multiple myeloma trials12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work