Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How to derive ‘ought’ from ‘is’

1 references·16 citing·54 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1975How To Do Things With Words21,513 cited

Cited by

2011An Anthropology of Ethics392 cited
2017The other question: can and should robots have rights?232 cited
2007I OUGHT, THEREFORE I CAN196 cited
2005Measuring Cultural Consonance: Examples with Special Reference to Measurement Theory in Anthropology186 cited
2008The Impossibility of the Separation Thesis: A Response to Joakim Sandberg185 cited
2011Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking174 cited
2011Imperatives: Meaning and Illocutionary Force163 cited
2009Constitutive Rules, Language, and Ontology156 cited
1993Second Thoughts About Bluffing144 cited
2003An Illuminating Exchange The Construction of Social Reality143 cited
2006The Normative Case Study142 cited
2007Two main problems in the sociology of morality139 cited
2019Institutional Analysis with the Institutional Grammar118 cited
1989Logic and the autonomy of ethics116 cited
2012The Epistemic Fault Line in Corporate Governance

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

113 cited

2010Psychology as a Moral Science: Perspectives on Normativity93 cited