App-based cognitive therapy for social anxiety disorder: A randomized-controlled comparison of guided and unguided app-based treatment versus waitlist

Abstract

Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy has demonstrated encouraging outcomes for patients diagnosed with social anxiety disorder (SAD). However, the impact of additional therapist-guidance remains debatable. The present study evaluates the effectiveness of the cognitive therapy app “Mindable: Social Phobia” comparing therapist-guided (vCT) and unguided self-help app (iCT) against a waitlist control group (WLC). We assigned 164 patients diagnosed with SAD randomly to one of the three groups, treatment lasting 12 weeks with 8 manualized video-conference delivered sessions in vCT. Assessments took place pre-treatment, midtreatment, posttreatment and follow-up 6 months after treatment (follow-up). The primary outcome was clinician-rated symptom severity (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale; LSAS), secondary outcomes included symptoms of depression and interpersonal pleasure. Drop-out rates were 9.3% in WLC, 42.6 % in iCT and 15% in vCT ( χ 2 = 19.5, p < .01). Both treatments reached significant stronger reduction of LSAS scores compared to WLC in all analyses (d [iCT vs. WLC] = -1.01, d [vCT vs. WLC] = -1.1). Using multiple imputation analyses, no significant difference was found in the LSAS between the two treatment groups ( t = -0.22, p = .830, d = 0.04). Patterns of results were similar for secondary outcomes. At follow-up, both treatment groups maintained treatment gains. Overall, the app demonstrates promising results, with patients clearly benefiting from the intervention. The add-on effects of the therapist-guidance favor provision of blended care as it prevents drop-out. • Cognitive therapy, delivered via self-help app, is effective with or without guidance • Therapist guidance is helpful to reduce the rate of attrition and enhance client satisfaction • Patients may also benefit regarding secondary outcomes such as depressive symptoms • The app's usage patterns significantly predict attrition

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.