SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Phases of Living Evidence Synthesis Using AI: Living Evidence Synthesis (Version 1)
16 references·0 citing·47 second hopsampled
The Phases of Living Evidence Synthesis Using AI: Living Evidence Synthesis (Version 1) (2026)The Phases of Living Evidence Synthesis U…Collaborative large language models for automated data extraction in living systematic reviews (2025)Collaborative large language …Extension of the PRISMA 2020 statement for living systematic reviews (PRISMA-LSR): checklist and explanation (2024)Extension of the PRISMA 2020 …Large language model applications for evaluation: Opportunities and ethical implications (2023)Large language model applicat…Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)Artificial intelligence in sy…Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)Tools to support the automati…Dynamic meta-analysis: a method of using global evidence for local decision making (2021)Dynamic meta-analysis: a meth…Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis (2021)Decision makers need constant…Artificial Intelligence in Government: Taking Stock and Moving Forward (2021)Artificial Intelligence in Go…Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline (2020)Synthesis without meta-analys…Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Living systematic reviews: 2.…Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Living systematic review: 1. …AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Living Systematic Reviews: An…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster (2008)Systematic reviews can be pro…How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)How Quickly Do Systematic Rev…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Emergency remote teaching in higher education: mapping the first global online semester (2021)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting (2018)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)The development of software to support multiple systematic review types (2018)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews (2020)An evaluation of Cochrane Crowd found that crowdsourcing produced accurate results in identifying randomized trials (2021)Climate policies that achieved major emission reductions: Global evidence from two decades (2024)Realizing the full potential of behavioural science for climate change mitigation (2024)Systematic review and meta-analysis of ex-post evaluations on the effectiveness of carbon pricing (2024)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2024)Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain (2024)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Here, There and Everywhere: On the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Management Research and the Peer‐Review Process (2024)Generative artificial intelligence use in evidence synthesis: A systematic review (2025)Using artificial intelligence for systematic review: the example of elicit (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,549 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,856 cited
  • 2020Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline4,846 cited
  • 2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
  • 2017Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how652 cited
  • 2014Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap595 cited
  • 2017Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort359 cited
  • 2023Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used268 cited
  • 2021Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review214 cited
  • 2021Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis159 cited
  • 2021Artificial Intelligence in Government: Taking Stock and Moving Forward159 cited
  • 2008Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster105 cited
  • 2024Extension of the PRISMA 2020 statement for living systematic reviews (PRISMA-LSR): checklist and explanation101 cited
  • 2023Large language model applications for evaluation: Opportunities and ethical implications

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

84 cited
  • 2025Collaborative large language models for automated data extraction in living systematic reviews53 cited
  • 2021Dynamic meta-analysis: a method of using global evidence for local decision making47 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.