SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Preferred Reporting Items for Concept Analysis in nursing: a systematic review
16 references·0 citing·42 second hopsampled
Preferred Reporting Items for Concept Analysis in nursing: a systematic review (2026)Preferred Reporting Items for Concept Ana…Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: a values-based approach (2024)Reporting guidelines for qual…Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews (2024)Rapid review method series: i…Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 (2024)Guideline for reporting syste…The use and quality of reporting of Rasch analysis in nursing research: A methodological scoping review (2022)The use and quality of report…Reporting according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for abstracts (PRISMA-A) depends on abstract length (2022)Reporting according to the pr…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Preferred reporting items for…Editorial: Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, and the Updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines (2021)Editorial: Review Articles, S…A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake (2021)A meta-review demonstrates im…Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement (2019)Quality of reporting of syste…Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for…Perception of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement of authors publishing reviews in nursing journals: a cross-sectional online survey (2019)Perception of the Preferred R…Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms (2017)Preferred reporting items for…Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Evaluations of the uptake and…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies) (2014)COREQ (Consolidated Criteria …Handbook of Qualitative Research. (1995)Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines (2001)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The quality of quality criteria: Replicating the development of the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) (2019)Coping strategies of individuals in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study (2022)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia: an overview of reviews (2019)Perceived stress, stressors, and coping strategies among nursing students in the Middle East and North Africa: an overview of systematic reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews (2017)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: a scoping review (2020)Introduction to Umbrella Reviews as a Useful Evidence-Based Practice (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Methodological quality of 100 recent systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments: an overview of reviews (2024)PRISMA-COSMIN 2024: New guidance aimed to enhance the reporting quality of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (2024)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient‑reported outcome measures: version 2.0 (2025)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2015)How do you solve a problem like COREQ? A critique of Tong et al.’s (2007) Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (2024)Nursing Academic Reviewers’ Perspectives on AI‐Assisted Peer Review: Ethical Challenges and Acceptance (2025)The approach and application of analysing inductive and deductive datasets: a worked example using reflexive thematic analysis (2025)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists (2021)orchaRd 2.0: An R package for visualising meta‐analyses with orchard plots (2023)Quantitative evidence synthesis: a practical guide on meta-analysis, meta-regression, and publication bias tests for environmental sciences (2023)¿Cómo hacer una revisión sistemática siguiendo el protocolo PRISMA? (2022)The Nexus Between Digital Technology, Innovation, Entrepreneurship Education, and Entrepreneurial Intention and Entrepreneurial Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review (2024)Large Language Models in Systematic Review Screening: Opportunities, Challenges, and Methodological Considerations (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2017Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review768 cited
  • 2021Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension708 cited
  • 2014COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies)597 cited
  • 2024Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: a values-based approach449 cited
  • 2021Editorial: Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, and the Updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines402 cited
  • 2017Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms251 cited
  • 2019Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions228 cited
  • 2024Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024123 cited
  • 2024Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews81 cited
  • 2019Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

66 cited
  • 2021A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake52 cited
  • 2022The use and quality of reporting of Rasch analysis in nursing research: A methodological scoping review52 cited
  • 2022Reporting according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for abstracts (PRISMA-A) depends on abstract length51 cited
  • 2019Perception of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement of authors publishing reviews in nursing journals: a cross-sectional online survey49 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.