SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Effectiveness of AI-based interventions in workplace mental health: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
16 references·0 citing·45 second hopsampled
Effectiveness of AI-based interventions in workplace mental health: a systematic review and narrative synthesis (2026)Effectiveness of AI-based interventions i…The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Workplace Well-Being: A Systematic Review (2024)The Role of Artificial Intell…Effectiveness of Digital Mental Health Interventions in the Workplace: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews (2024)Effectiveness of Digital Ment…Vickybot, a Chatbot for Anxiety-Depressive Symptoms and Work-Related Burnout in Primary Care and Health Care Professionals: Development, Feasibility, and Potential Effectiveness Studies (2023)Vickybot, a Chatbot for Anxie…Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being (2023)Systematic review and meta-an…Changes in stress, burnout, and resilience associated with an 8-week intervention with relational agent “Woebot” (2023)Changes in stress, burnout, a…In What Ways Does Health Related Stigma Affect Sustainable Employment and Well-Being at Work? A Systematic Review (2021)In What Ways Does Health Rela…A Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent for a Mental Health Care App: Evaluation Study of Its Participatory Design (2021)A Conversational Artificial I…Smartphone Apps for the Treatment of Mental Disorders: Systematic Review (2020)Smartphone Apps for the Treat…Effectiveness and Safety of Using Chatbots to Improve Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020)Effectiveness and Safety of U…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Efficacy of mobile application interventions for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review (2019)Efficacy of mobile applicatio…Effectiveness of occupational e-mental health interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2019)Effectiveness of occupational…Digital mental health apps and the therapeutic alliance: initial review (2019)Digital mental health apps an…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)What is missing from descript…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: The CALO-RE taxonomy (2011)Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data) (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)“They Are Not Hard-to-Reach Clients. We Have Just Got Hard-to-Reach Services.” Staff Views of Digital Health Tools in Specialist Mental Health Services. (2019)The emergence of digital mental health in low-income and middle-income countries: A review of recent advances and implications for the treatment and prevention of mental disorders (2020)Potential and Pitfalls of Mobile Mental Health Apps in Traditional Treatment: An Umbrella Review (2022)The CES-D Scale (1977)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The Empirical Status of Mindfulness-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review of 44 Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2021)Mental Health During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Recommendations for Moving Forward (2022)Public mental health: required actions to address implementation failure in the context of COVID-19 (2022)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies (2000)Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Adoption of Mobile Apps for Depression and Anxiety: Cross-Sectional Survey Study on Patient Interest and Barriers to Engagement (2018)Reviewing the data security and privacy policies of mobile apps for depression (2018)Social isolation, mental health, and use of digital interventions in youth during the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationally representative survey (2021)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Perceptions and Opinions of Patients About Mental Health Chatbots: Scoping Review (2020)Artificially intelligent chatbots in digital mental health interventions: a review (2021)Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance (2023)A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews (2009)Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination against people with schizophrenia: a cross-sectional survey (2009)Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Effectiveness of interventions for improving livelihood outcomes for people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review (2022)Factors relevant to work participation from the perspective of adults with developmental dyslexia: a systematic review of qualitative studies (2022)Fostering employee work engagement and sustainable employment during COVID-19 crisis through HR practices, employee psychological well-being and psychological empowerment (2023)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)A power primer. (1992)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)“It happened to be the perfect thing”: experiences of generative AI chatbots for mental health (2024)Ethical Considerations in Artificial Intelligence Interventions for Mental Health and Well-Being: Ensuring Responsible Implementation and Impact (2024)Expressing stigma and inappropriate responses prevents LLMs from safely replacing mental health providers. (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2008What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?613 cited
  • 2023Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being592 cited
  • 2020Effectiveness and Safety of Using Chatbots to Improve Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis502 cited
  • 2020Smartphone Apps for the Treatment of Mental Disorders: Systematic Review188 cited
  • 2019Digital mental health apps and the therapeutic alliance: initial review152 cited
  • 2019Effectiveness of occupational e-mental health interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials148 cited
  • 2021In What Ways Does Health Related Stigma Affect Sustainable Employment and Well-Being at Work? A Systematic Review74 cited
  • 2023Vickybot, a Chatbot for Anxiety-Depressive Symptoms and Work-Related Burnout in Primary Care and Health Care Professionals: Development, Feasibility, and Potential Effectiveness Studies70 cited
  • 2021A Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent for a Mental Health Care App: Evaluation Study of Its Participatory Design64 cited
  • 2024The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Workplace Well-Being: A Systematic Review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

64 cited
  • 2023Changes in stress, burnout, and resilience associated with an 8-week intervention with relational agent “Woebot”60 cited
  • 2019Efficacy of mobile application interventions for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review54 cited
  • 2024Effectiveness of Digital Mental Health Interventions in the Workplace: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews44 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.