SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic review and meta analysis of chatbots in the management of depressive and anxiety symptoms
16 references·1 citing·43 second hopsampled
Systematic review and meta analysis of chatbots in the management of depressive and anxiety symptoms (2026)Systematic review and meta analysis of ch…Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being (2023)Systematic review and meta-an…Conversational Agent Interventions for Mental Health Problems: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2023)Conversational Agent Interven…Using AI chatbots to provide self-help depression interventions for university students: A randomized trial of effectiveness (2022)Using AI chatbots to provide …Potential and Pitfalls of Mobile Mental Health Apps in Traditional Treatment: An Umbrella Review (2022)Potential and Pitfalls of Mob…Mental Health Chatbot for Young Adults With Depressive Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Single-Blind, Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial (2022)Mental Health Chatbot for You…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Effectiveness and Safety of Using Chatbots to Improve Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020)Effectiveness and Safety of U…Use of the Chatbot “Vivibot” to Deliver Positive Psychology Skills and Promote Well-Being Among Young People After Cancer Treatment: Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial (2019)Use of the Chatbot “Vivibot” …RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…An overview of the features of chatbots in mental health: A scoping review (2019)An overview of the features o…Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences (2018)Testing for funnel plot asymm…An Empathy-Driven, Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent (Wysa) for Digital Mental Well-Being: Real-World Data Evaluation Mixed-Methods Study (2018)An Empathy-Driven, Conversati…Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial (2017)Delivering Cognitive Behavior…Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values (2016)Conducting Meta-Analyses Base…Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis (2015)Methods to estimate the betwe…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Digital Mental Health Research Priorities, Revisited for the AI and Large Language Model Era (2026)Digital Mental Health Researc…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random‐effects meta‐analyses (2018)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. (1988)The PHQ-9 (2001)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Chatbots and Conversational Agents in Mental Health: A Review of the Psychiatric Landscape (2019)Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy (2019)Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r. (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The Effects of Family-School Partnership Interventions on Academic and Social-Emotional Functioning: a Meta-Analysis Exploring What Works for Whom (2019)Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta‐analyses of health research: A review (2020)Video Improves Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Artificially intelligent chatbots in digital mental health interventions: a review (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Perceptions and Opinions of Patients About Mental Health Chatbots: Scoping Review (2020)Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)A power primer. (1992)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)“It happened to be the perfect thing”: experiences of generative AI chatbots for mental health (2024)Ethical Considerations in Artificial Intelligence Interventions for Mental Health and Well-Being: Ensuring Responsible Implementation and Impact (2024)Expressing stigma and inappropriate responses prevents LLMs from safely replacing mental health providers. (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2017Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial2,713 cited
  • 2015Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis1,677 cited
  • 2018An Empathy-Driven, Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent (Wysa) for Digital Mental Well-Being: Real-World Data Evaluation Mixed-Methods Study1,061 cited
  • 2019An overview of the features of chatbots in mental health: A scoping review602 cited
  • 2023Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being592 cited
  • 2020Effectiveness and Safety of Using Chatbots to Improve Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis502 cited
  • 2018Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences352 cited
  • 2022Using AI chatbots to provide self-help depression interventions for university students: A randomized trial of effectiveness296 cited
  • 2019Use of the Chatbot “Vivibot” to Deliver Positive Psychology Skills and Promote Well-Being Among Young People After Cancer Treatment: Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial264 cited
  • 2016

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values
219 cited
  • 2023Conversational Agent Interventions for Mental Health Problems: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials213 cited
  • 2022Mental Health Chatbot for Young Adults With Depressive Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Single-Blind, Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial178 cited
  • 2022Potential and Pitfalls of Mobile Mental Health Apps in Traditional Treatment: An Umbrella Review155 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2026Digital Mental Health Research Priorities, Revisited for the AI and Large Language Model Era4 cited