SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Mapping the Intellectual Landscape of Coaching Psychology: An Interdisciplinary Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Mapping the Intellectual Landscape of Coaching Psychology: An Interdisciplinary Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis (2026)Mapping the Intellectual Landscape of Coa…Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scop…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR) (2021)Scientific procedures and rat…Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Journal article reporting sta…Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Journal article reporting sta…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta‐analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching (2015)The effectiveness of workplac…Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)Bibliometric Methods in Manag…Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context (2013)Does coaching work? A meta-an…Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base (2012)Entrepreneurship: Exploring t…An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field (2010)An approach for detecting, qu…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Towards a Methodology for Dev…The coach–athlete relationship: a motivational model (2003)The coach–athlete relationshi…Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future Directions (2003)Entrepreneurship Research in …Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers (1963)Bibliographic coupling betwee…Fuzzy sets (1965)Fuzzy sets (1996)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)SciMAT : A new science mapping analysis software tool (2012)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (2003)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Editorial: Journal article reporting standards. (2018)Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting (2023)Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: a values-based approach (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation (1990)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Advances in Consumer Research (2025)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice (2022)Artificial Intelligence in Advertising: Advancements, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations in Targeting, Personalization, Content Creation, and Ad Optimization (2023)The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: ‘what’, ‘why’, and ‘how to contribute’ (2022)Personalization in personalized marketing: Trends and ways forward (2022)Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, Why and How? (2023)Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? (2010)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2003Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review15,354 cited
  • 2014Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization7,468 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 1963Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers2,873 cited
  • 2010An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field2,756 cited
  • 2021Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World2,676 cited
  • 2021Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR)2,355 cited
  • 2018Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.2,279 cited
  • 2018Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.1,446 cited
  • 2003The coach–athlete relationship: a motivational model1,404 cited
  • 2003Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future Directions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

926 cited
  • 2013Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context769 cited
  • 2015The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta‐analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching611 cited
  • 2012Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base555 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.