SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
E-commerce adoption in livestock product marketing: a systematic review of challenges and opportunities in selected developing countries
11 references·0 citing·50 second hop
E-commerce adoption in livestock product marketing: a systematic review of challenges and opportunities in selected developing countries (2026)E-commerce adoption in livestock product …Digitalisation in agriculture: A scoping review of technologies in practice, challenges, and opportunities for smallholder farmers in sub-saharan africa (2024)Digitalisation in agriculture…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…E-Commerce in Agri-Food Sector: A Systematic Literature Review Based on Service-Dominant Logic (2021)E-Commerce in Agri-Food Secto…A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)A tale of two databases: the …Qualitative evidence synthesis for complex interventions and guideline development: clarification of the purpose, designs and relevant methods (2019)Qualitative evidence synthesi…The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers (2018)The Mixed Methods Appraisal T…E-commerce in agri-food sector: a systematic literature review (2017)E-commerce in agri-food secto…Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Methods for the thematic synt…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Towards a Methodology for Dev…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review (2014)The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review (2016)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (2003)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The role of e-marketplaces in supply chain management (2003)Rural cooperatives in the digital age: An analysis of the Internet presence and degree of maturity of agri-food cooperatives' e-commerce (2019)Impact of COVID-19 on the food supply chain (2020)Factors influencing consumers’ continuous purchase intention on fresh food e-commerce platforms: An organic foods-centric empirical investigation (2021)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2002)Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (2012)Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions (2019)Innovations in framework synthesis as a systematic review method (2020)Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Where Are We at? (2021)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Worker and workplace Artificial Intelligence (AI) coexistence: Emerging themes and research agenda (2023)Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development (2024)How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A systematic review of mobile agricultural service applications for smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa: perspectives from the technology acceptance model (2025)Challenges and opportunities in smallholder agriculture digitization in South Africa (2025)Understanding farmers’ acceptance of digital technologies: a meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach based on the technology acceptance model (2026)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review (2020)A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being (2021)Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2003Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review15,354 cited
  • 2008Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews9,266 cited
  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 2018The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers4,688 cited
  • 2020A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers1,554 cited
  • 2019Qualitative evidence synthesis for complex interventions and guideline development: clarification of the purpose, designs and relevant methods389 cited
  • 2024Digitalisation in agriculture: A scoping review of technologies in practice, challenges, and opportunities for smallholder farmers in sub-saharan africa207 cited
  • 2017E-commerce in agri-food sector: a systematic literature review182 cited
  • 2021E-Commerce in Agri-Food Sector: A Systematic Literature Review Based on Service-Dominant Logic39 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work