Teaching Generation Alpha: Rethinking Teacher–Student Relationships and Classroom Practices Across Generations

Abstract

This study examines how the arrival of Generation Alpha in formal schooling is reshaping teacher–student relationships and classroom practices. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 46 primary and middle school teachers in Türkiye, this study shows that classroom interactions have increasingly become sites of intergenerational negotiation, where communication, authority, and learning processes are redefined. Rather than providing another descriptive account of generational characteristics, the study explores how intergenerational differences are enacted, contested, and managed within pedagogical relationships. Findings indicate that teachers perceive Generation Alpha students as technologically embedded, self-confident, and highly responsive to digital environments, yet also as more self-centered, less rule-oriented, and characterized by shorter attention spans. These perceived differences give rise to tensions around communication, authority, and classroom discipline. Importantly, the study shows that such tensions are not merely behavioral but are rooted in broader socio-cultural and technological transformations that reshape students’ relationships with knowledge, time, and authority. In response, teachers develop adaptive and relational practices, including experiential and student-centered learning, empathy-based communication, and strategic engagement with students’ digital cultures. These practices reflect a broader reconfiguration of teaching, in which authority is increasingly negotiated rather than assumed, and learning processes are co-constructed rather than transmitted. The study contributes to the literature by showing that generational differences gain educational significance through everyday classroom interactions and by conceptualizing teaching as a context-sensitive, adaptive practice in digitally mediated educational environments.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 0 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.