Awareness about vaccine vial monitor at pulse polio booths.

Rajesh K Chudasama

10 citations0/0 files storedPubMed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting Intramuscular injections and effects

Abstract

All members present on booth, working on National Immunization Day during January and February, 2007 were interviewed by using predesigned and pretested questionnaires to assess their awareness regarding type of OPV and VVM in urban areas of Valsad district. Correct identification of trivalent OPV was highest (54.8%) among health staff members working at booths, but for monovalent OPV it was poor (38.7%). More than half (51.6%) of staff members interviewed had not heard of VVM. Awareness was very poor for VVM among those who have heard regarding its function, how to read VVM and when OPV should be discarded.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

2000Staff awareness of oral polio vaccine vial monitor in Chandigarh

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.