References

• 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
• 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
• 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
• 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
• 2001Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis2,229 cited
• 2007Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography1,532 cited
• 2012The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews1,430 cited
• 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
• 2011Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial291 cited
• 2013PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility188 cited
• 2015Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic166 cited
• 2014Blinded by PRISMA: Are Systematic Reviewers Focusing on PRISMA and Ignoring Other Guidelines?116 cited
• 2014Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality112 cited