SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What can we learn from the Hwang and Sudbø affairs?
5 references·3 citing·30 second hop
What can we learn from the Hwang and Sudbø affairs? (2006)What can we learn from the Hwang and Sudb…Authorship: rules, rights, responsibilities and recommendations. (2000)Authorship: rules, rights, re…Authorship: time for a paradigm shift? (1997)Authorship: time for a paradi…Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)Publishing by—and for?—the Nu…Lessons from the Darsee Affair (1983)Lessons from the Darsee AffairCoping with Fraud: The Darsee Case (1983)Coping with Fraud: The Darsee…A comparative study on characteristics of retracted publications across different open access levels (2024)A comparative study on charac…Scientific misconducts and authorship conflicts: Indian perspective (2015)Scientific misconducts and au…Rétractations pour erreur et pour fraude (2012)Rétractations pour erreur et …Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Multiple Publications: The Main Reason for the Retraction of Papers in Computer Science (2018)Posthumous co-authorship revisited (2021)The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers (1994)Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey (1996)The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty (1997)How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke (2002)The Ethical Assignment of Authorship in Scientific Publications: Issues and Guidelines (2008)Qualitative methods for health research (2009)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)The preregistration revolution (2018)Global perspectives on retracted papers in artificial intelligence and machine learning: a bibliometric study (2025)An analytic hierarchy process model to apportion co-author responsibility (2006)Ethical Issues in Multiple-Authored and Mentor-Supervised Publications (2011)Publishing Without Perishing: A Guide to the Successful Reporting of Clinical Data (2019)When Authorship Fails (1997)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Ring a Ring o’ Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies* (2007)Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing (2011)Authorship and Other Credits (1984)Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies? (2003)Responsible conduct in research (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1990Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers246 cited
  • 1983Lessons from the Darsee Affair149 cited
  • 1997Authorship: time for a paradigm shift?113 cited
  • 1983Coping with Fraud: The Darsee Case73 cited
  • 2000Authorship: rules, rights, responsibilities and recommendations.28 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Scientific misconducts and authorship conflicts: Indian perspective17 cited
  • 2012Rétractations pour erreur et pour fraude11 cited
  • 2024A comparative study on characteristics of retracted publications across different open access levels10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work