When the Rabbi Weeps: On Reading Gender in Talmudic Aggadah

Charlotte Elisheva Fonrobert

28 citations0/0 files storedProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Biblical Studies and Interpretation Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies Gender and Feminist Studies

Abstract

One of the most famous aggadot in talmudic literature, and probably the most discussed in talmudic and general Jewish scholarship,1 is the story of the Oven of Akhnai. Both the Palestinian Talmud (Mo'ed katan 3:1, 81c-d) and the Babylonian Talmud (Baba metzia 58b-59b) provide versions of it, embedded in different contexts. In the Babylonian Talmud's version, on which this paper will focus, the story is attached to a mishnah2 in which Rabbi Eliezer disagrees with the sages about the capacity of a certain oven to render items ritually impure or not. Interestingly, the talmudic story focuses on the manner in which the discussion between them is carried out rather than on the question of the halakhic nature of the oven itself. Not only is the ultimate reason for the mishnaic disagreement obscured; even the question of why the talmudic story-tellers attach the story to this mishnaic disagreement rather than to any other mishnaic disagreement between Rabbi Eliezer and the sages remains unanswered.3 Thus, Rabbi Eliezer invokes miracles to support his opinion a jumping carob tree, backward-flowing water, the inclining walls of the beit midrash4 in which the Talmud locates the discussion, and finally a voice from heaven, proofs that end up being rejected by his rabbinic colleagues. Meanwhile, the substance of Rabbi Eliezer's opinion is rendered completely irrelevant. The discussion ends with the seeming victory of the sages. This victory provides them with a conceptual basis for their hermeneutic and legal authority, culled midrashically from biblical verses: it is not in heaven (Deut. 30:12) turning the Torah into the referent of the biblical phrase; and incline after the majority (Ex. 23:2) in halakhic decision-making.5 The talmudic editors6 then seal the argumentary victory of the sages, not

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

References

1996Playing the other: gender and society in classical Greek literature 1996Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash 1994Carnal Israel: reading sex in Talmudic culture 1994Intertextuality and the Reading of Midrash 2002Dying for God: Martyrdom and the Making of Christianity and Judaism 2000‘Begotten, Not Made’: Conceiving Manhood in Late Antiquity 1998The Exegetical Imagination: On Jewish Thought and Theology 1996Midrash and Theory: Ancient Jewish Exegesis and Contemporary Literary Studies

Cited by

2010A Menu of Orientations to the Teaching of Rabbinic Literature 2015Simeon and Other Women in Theodoret’s Religious History : Gender in the Representation of Late Ancient Christian Asceticism

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.