SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
"The ""Right to Be Forgotten"": Reconciling EU and US Perspectives"
0 references·9 citing·38 second hop
"The ""Right to Be Forgotten"": Reconciling EU and US Perspectives" (2012)"The ""Right to Be Forgotten"": Reconcili…The General Data Protection Regulation (2021)The General Data Protection R…The Right to Erasure in EU Data Protection Law (2020)The Right to Erasure in EU Da…The Right to Be Forgotten in the European Perspective (2020)The Right to Be Forgotten in …El derecho al olvido digital: una brecha entre Europa y Estados Unidos (2019)El derecho al olvido digital:…International Data Flows and Privacy: The Conflict and Its Resolution (2018)International Data Flows and …The European right to be forgotten: A challenge to the United States Constitution’s First Amendment and to professional public relations ethics (2016)The European right to be forg…How the “Right to be Forgotten” Challenges Journalistic Principles (2016)How the “Right to be Forgotte…Speaking of forgetting: Analysis of possible non-EU responses to the right to be forgotten and speech exception (2014)Speaking of forgetting: Analy…Default entitlements in personal data in the proposed Regulation: Informational self-determination off the table … and back on again? (2014)Default entitlements in perso…The Problem of Social Cost (1960)Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem (1990)A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics (1998)Not just User Control in the General Data Protection Regulation (2016)The Regulation of Personal and Non-Personal Data in the Context of Big Data (2023)‘Outlines of a World Coming into Existence’: Pervasive Computing and the Ethics of Forgetting (2007)Delete: the virtue of forgetting in the digital age (2010)The Right to Be Forgotten (2012)Timing the Right to Be Forgotten: A Study into “Time” as a Factor in Deciding About Retention or Erasure of Data (2014)Gender Transition: Is There a Right to Be Forgotten? (2021)Data Retention and the Panoptic Society: The Social Benefits of Forgetfulness (2002)The EU Proposal for a General Data Protection Regulation and the roots of the ‘right to be forgotten’ (2013)Protecting News Companies and Their Readers: Exploring Social Media Policies in Latin American Newsrooms (2020)Toward a dialogic theory of public relations (2002)Universal Declaration of Human Rights (2011)The theory of communicative action (2014)Ethical challenges in an evolving digital communication era: coping resources and ethics trainings in corporate communications (2022)THE COSTS OF DATA LOCALISATION: FRIENDLY FIRE ON ECONOMIC RECOVERY (2014)Toward a Global Approach to Data in the Digital Age (2021)The impact of artificial intelligence and emerging technologies on international electronic commerce (2024)11. The Right to Privacy (1890)Privacy and Freedom (1970)The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You (2011)Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think (2013)Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks (2014)Extraterritorial application of the GDPR: promoting European values or power? (2021)The GDPR enshrines the right to the impersonal price (2022)Fairness by Design: Cross-Cultural Perspectives from Children on AI and Fair Data Processing in their Education Futures (2025)Forgetting personal data and revoking consent under the GDPR: Challenges and proposed solutions (2018)6th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES and ARTS Proceedings, Modern Science (2019)Critical Views on the Right to Be Forgotten After the Entry Into Force of the GDPR: Is it Able to Effectively Ensure Our Privacy? (2021)Personal Data Protection in the Decision-Making of the CJEU Before and After the Lisbon Treaty (2021)THE CONCEPT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL ERA/ CHANGES AND CONSEQUENCES FOR JUDICIAL PRACTICE (2022)Memory, History, Forgetting (2004)A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization (2012)Data Subject Rights as a Tool for Platform Worker Resistance: Lessons from the Uber/Ola Judgments (2022)A multi-disciplinary review of enablers and barriers to Cloud ERP implementation and innovation outcomes (2023)Data Subject Rights as a Tool for Platform Worker Resistance: Lessons from the Uber/Ola Judgments (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2021The General Data Protection Regulation78 cited
  • 2020The Right to Erasure in EU Data Protection Law53 cited
  • 2018International Data Flows and Privacy: The Conflict and Its Resolution42 cited
  • 2014Default entitlements in personal data in the proposed Regulation: Informational self-determination off the table … and back on again?30 cited
  • 2020The Right to Be Forgotten in the European Perspective21 cited
  • 2014Speaking of forgetting: Analysis of possible non-EU responses to the right to be forgotten and speech exception20 cited
  • 2016How the “Right to be Forgotten” Challenges Journalistic Principles18 cited
  • 2016The European right to be forgotten: A challenge to the United States Constitution’s First Amendment and to professional public relations ethics16 cited
  • 2019El derecho al olvido digital: una brecha entre Europa y Estados Unidos14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work