Reliability analysis of the motivation assessment scale.

Scott Spreat · L. Connelly

47 citations0/0 files storedPubMed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Psychological Testing and Assessment Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

Abstract

The Motivation Assessment Scale was submitted to several variations of reliability analysis. Internal consistency was found to be superior to interrater reliability. Difference score reliability was insufficient to permit profile analysis.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 47 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2003Functional Behavior Assessment Rating Scales: Intrarater Reliability with Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders 2004Functional Assessment of Problem Behaviors in Adults with Mental Retardation 2005A Comparison of Results and Acceptability of Functional Behavioral Assessment Procedures with a Group of Middle School Students with Emotional/Behavioral Disorders (E/BD)2012Context Influences the Motivation for Stereotypic and Repetitive Behaviour in Children Diagnosed with Intellectual Disability with and without Autism 2006Staff Training and Challenging Behaviour 2017THE CURRENT STATUS OF INDIRECT FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS 2021Motivation Assessment Scale

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.