Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

What Keynes Would Have Thought of the Development of ISLM

10 references·5 citing·28 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1936The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.14,687 cited
1936The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.12,863 cited
1954Essays in Positive Economics.3,025 cited
1937Mr. Keynes and the "Classics"; A Suggested Interpretation1,942 cited
1978The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes1,073 cited
1962Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth734 cited
1937Mr. Keynes and Traditional Theory192 cited
1974What Has Become of the Keynesian Revolution?126 cited
1972Keynes and Traditional Theory74 cited
2022Modern macroeconomics57 cited

Cited by

2018Keynes Versus Robertson in 1936–1937: Robertson’s Mathematical Illiteracy Prevented Him From Understanding Keynes’s Is-Lm(lp) Model in the General Theory10 cited
2017Who were the Real Bastard Keynesianss? The Neoclassical Synthesis Keynesians (Samuelson, Hansen, Hicks, Klein, Solow) or the Post Keynesians (Joan Robinson, Austin Robinson, Richard Kahn, G L S Shackle, Sydney Weintraub, Paul Davidson)9 cited
2017The 'Uncertainty' Fraud: Joan Robinson, G. L. S. Shackle and Paul Davidson's Sleight of Hand Change of Keynes's Uncertainty Definition in the General Theory9 cited
2017The Unbridgeable Gulf Forever Separating A. Smith and J. M. Keynes from Bentham, Classical Economists, Neoclassical Economists, And ‘Modern’ Economists (Friedman, Becker, Stigler, Lucas, Sargent, Wallace, Muth, Kydland, Prescott, etc.): The Formal and Mathematical Concepts of Uncertainty, Weight of the Evidence, and Confidence

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1 cited

2018On Keynes's a Treatise on Probability and General Theory: Why the Basic, Essential Foundations for Both Works Were Not Understood by Economists and Philosophers0 cited