Abstract This book contributes to an old debate now enjoying a revival: should we expect languages spoken a few thousand years ago, such as Proto-Indo-European, to be less well-equipped than modern languages when it comes to subordinate clauses? Early Greek relative clauses provide a test case for this problem. Early Greek uses several kinds of relative clause, but all these are usually thought to come from one, or at most two, prehistoric types. In a new look at the evidence, this book finds that a rich variety of relative clause types has been in place for a considerable time. The reconstruction of prehistoric linguistic stages requires detailed work on the individual languages descending from them. A substantial part of the book is therefore devoted to a new look at the relative clause systems found in a wide variety of early Greek texts. It emerges that the same basic system is in use across all these texts. Different kinds of relative clause predominate in different kinds of text, however, because relative clause syntax and semantics interact with the needs of different kinds of text. The widespread currency of the same system across different dialects and genres speaks against the idea that significant aspects of this system were only just emerging. Moreover, in all the texts considered there is little genuine competition between the different constructions, such as we ought to find if some constructions were gaining ground from others. Each construction has its own syntactic and semantic conditions.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 152 citations exist upstream.