SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Science and Engineering Ethics.
0 references·16 citing·50 second hop
Science and Engineering Ethics. (2014)Science and Engineering Ethics.Are Algorithms Value-Free? (2023)Are Algorithms Value-Free?The European Legislation on AI: A Brief Analysis of Its Philosophical Approach (2022)The European Legislation on A…Public preferences for governing AI technology: Comparative evidence (2022)Public preferences for govern…New form of innovations related to the environment - a systematic review (2021)New form of innovations relat…Authorship and justice: Credit and responsibility (2020)Authorship and justice: Credi…What do academics know and do about plagiarism? An interview study with Chinese university teachers of English (2019)What do academics know and do…Responsible innovation in business: a critical reflection on deliberative engagement as a central governance mechanism (2019)Responsible innovation in bus…Assessing the Efficacy of a Training Intervention to Reduce Acceptance of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology Graduate Students (2019)Assessing the Efficacy of a T…The Ethos of Science and Its Correlates: An Empirical Analysis of Scientists’ Endorsement of Mertonian Norms (2018)The Ethos of Science and Its …Honorary Authorship Practices in Environmental Science Teams: Structural and Cultural Factors and Solutions (2016)Honorary Authorship Practices…Research Integrity Practices from the Perspective of Early-Career Researchers (2014)Research Integrity Practices …Improving Ethical Knowledge and Sensemaking from Cases through Elaborative Interrogation and Outcome Valence (2014)Improving Ethical Knowledge a…Ethnographic Research in a Cyber Era (2013)Ethnographic Research in a Cy…Data Audit as a Way to Prevent/Contain Misconduct (2013)Data Audit as a Way to Preven…A Systemic Analysis of Cheating in an Undergraduate Engineering Mechanics Course (2013)A Systemic Analysis of Cheati…Mentors, advisors and supervisors: Their role in teaching responsible research conduct (2001)Mentors, advisors and supervi…Scientists behaving badly (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Science publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)Taking steps to increase the trustworthiness of scientific research (2014)Data falsification and question on academic integrity (2018)Evaluating solutions to the problem of false positives (2018)Academic Mentoring for Women Students and Faculty: A New Look at an Old Way to Get Ahead. (1983)Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey (1996)Promoting responsible conduct in research through “survival skills” workshops: Some mentoring is best done in a crowd (2001)Measures of Mentoring, Department Climate, and Graduate Student Preparedness in the Responsible Conduct of Psychological Research (2009)The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (1968)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH CHEATING AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS: A Review (1998)The Chronicle of Higher Education (1977)What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists??? Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists (2007)In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities (2017)Research Integrity Among PhD Students at the Faculty of Medicine: A Comparison of Three Scandinavian Universities (2020)Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study (2021)The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. (1956)Ethnography In/Of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography (1995)Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (2012)Loud and proud: Passion and politics in the English Defence League (2016)‘EDL angels stand beside their men … not behind them’: the politics of gender and sexuality in an anti-Islam(ist) movement (2017)Face-to-Face Compared With Online Collected Accounts of Health and Illness Experiences: A Scoping Review (2020)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2006)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Author contributions to ecological publications: What does it mean to be an author in modern ecological research? (2017)Honorary Authorships in Surgical Literature (2018)Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing (2021)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations (2000)Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations (2012)Who’s Afraid of Adversariality? Conflict and Cooperation in Argumentation (2020)Investigating the links between questionable research practices, scientific norms and organisational culture (2024)Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. (1970)Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation (1990)The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research (2000)RETRACTED ARTICLE: Interconnected Knowledge: Examining the Evolution of Graduate Student Innovation Ecosystems (2023)The Role of Governance in Achieving Sustainability in Family-Owned Business: Do Responsible Innovation and Entrepreneurial Culture Matter? (2023)Self-Perception Theory (1972)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Testing an active intervention to deter researchers’ use of questionable research practices (2019)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? (2016)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)The influence of China in AI governance through standardisation (2023)Governance of artificial intelligence in Southeast Asia (2024)What does the public think about artificial intelligence? An investigation of technological frames in different technological context (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2013Ethnographic Research in a Cyber Era203 cited
  • 2019Responsible innovation in business: a critical reflection on deliberative engagement as a central governance mechanism131 cited
  • 2001Mentors, advisors and supervisors: Their role in teaching responsible research conduct74 cited
  • 2016Honorary Authorship Practices in Environmental Science Teams: Structural and Cultural Factors and Solutions35 cited
  • 2014Research Integrity Practices from the Perspective of Early-Career Researchers34 cited
  • 2013Data Audit as a Way to Prevent/Contain Misconduct32 cited
  • 2018The Ethos of Science and Its Correlates: An Empirical Analysis of Scientists’ Endorsement of Mertonian Norms30 cited
  • 2022Public preferences for governing AI technology: Comparative evidence28 cited
  • 2019Assessing the Efficacy of a Training Intervention to Reduce Acceptance of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology Graduate Students26 cited
  • 2013A Systemic Analysis of Cheating in an Undergraduate Engineering Mechanics Course26 cited
  • 2019What do academics know and do about plagiarism? An interview study with Chinese university teachers of English25 cited
  • 2023Are Algorithms Value-Free?23 cited
  • 2014Improving Ethical Knowledge and Sensemaking from Cases through Elaborative Interrogation and Outcome Valence23 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2022The European Legislation on AI: A Brief Analysis of Its Philosophical Approach22 cited
  • 2021New form of innovations related to the environment - a systematic review22 cited
  • 2020Authorship and justice: Credit and responsibility22 cited