Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Government Deficit Spending Is Not Incompatible with the Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit: A Reply to Fleck and Domenghino

9 references·6 citing·31 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1971Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth682 cited
1988The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics473 cited
1966The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models352 cited
1975Growth and Income Distribution. Essays in Economic Theory.269 cited
1981Growth and income distribution: Essays in economic theory200 cited
1972The State and the Outcome of the Pasinetti Process52 cited
1989Ricardian debt / taxation equivalence in the Kaldor theory of profits and income distribution48 cited
1987Cambridge (U.K.) versus Cambridge (Mass.): A Keynesian Solution of “Pasinetti’s Paradox”33 cited
1983Conditions of Existence of a Two Class Economy in the Kaldor and More General Models of Growth and Income Distribution32 cited

Cited by

1993TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO FINANCIAL MODEL BUILDING17 cited
1990Government ActivityDoesInvalidate the “Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit”15 cited
1992The Government Sector in Kaldor–Pasinetti Models of Growth and Income Distribution14 cited
1991Does Government Activity Invalidate the Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit? A Reconciliation10 cited
1993Notes on the Cambridge Equation10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1991

A Note on Dalziel’s Model of Long-Run Distributive Equilibrium

8 cited