SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Charter Dialogue Revisited: Or "Much Ado About Metaphors"
0 references·8 citing·30 second hop
Charter Dialogue Revisited: Or "Much Ado About Metaphors" (2007)Charter Dialogue Revisited: Or "Much Ado …Public Support for Canadian Courts: Understanding the Roles of Institutional Trust and Partisanship (2022)Public Support for Canadian C…Reconstructing Rights: Courts, Parties, and Equality Rights in India, South Africa, and the United States (2019)Reconstructing Rights: Courts…Assisted dying, suspended declarations, and dialogue’s time (2019)Assisted dying, suspended dec…Separation of Powers and the Growth of Judicial Review in Established Democracies (or Why Has the Model of Legislative Supremacy Mostly Been Withdrawn From Sale?) (2014)Separation of Powers and the …Dialogue or compliance? Measuring legislatures’ policy responses to court rulings on rights (2012)Dialogue or compliance? Measu…Strategic Legitimacy Cultivation at the Supreme Court of Canada: QuebecSecession Referenceand Beyond (2010)Strategic Legitimacy Cultivat…Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates (2010)Parliamentary Sovereignty: Co…The Unfulfilled Potential of the Court and Legislature Dialogue (2009)The Unfulfilled Potential of …Judicial Review in New Democracies (2003)Political Constitutionalism (2007)Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism (2008)The Dilemmas of Constitutional Courts and the Case for a New Design of Kelsenian Institutions (2020)Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism (2021)Taking Rights Seriously (1978)Democracy and disagreement (1997)Law and Disagreement (1999)The choices justices make (1997)The Rights Revolution (1998)Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe (2002)Approaching the Legitimacy Paradox in Hong Kong: Lessons for Hybrid Regime Courts (2020)The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn't Such a Bad Thing after All) (1997)The Core of the Case against Judicial Review (2006)Weak Courts, Strong Rights (2009)Dialogic Judicial Review and its Critics (2008)Judges as moral reasoners (2008)Remedies for violations of Indigenous peoples’ human rights (2019)Multicultural citizenship: a liberal theory of minority rights (1996)Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse (2008)Justice and the Politics of Difference (2012)A Systems Analysis of Political Life (1966)On the Legitimacy of National High Courts (1998)Why People Obey the Law (2006)The Concept of Law (1961)Democracy and Its Critics (1962)Studies in the Way of Words (1989)Geographical indications in the UK after Brexit: An uncertain future? (2019)Research horizons for public and private not‐for‐profit sector reporting: moving the bar in the right direction (2019)Constituent Power and the Law (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2010Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates82 cited
  • 2014Separation of Powers and the Growth of Judicial Review in Established Democracies (or Why Has the Model of Legislative Supremacy Mostly Been Withdrawn From Sale?)33 cited
  • 2012Dialogue or compliance? Measuring legislatures’ policy responses to court rulings on rights23 cited
  • 2010Strategic Legitimacy Cultivation at the Supreme Court of Canada: QuebecSecession Referenceand Beyond23 cited
  • 2019Assisted dying, suspended declarations, and dialogue’s time19 cited
  • 2019Reconstructing Rights: Courts, Parties, and Equality Rights in India, South Africa, and the United States15 cited
  • 2009The Unfulfilled Potential of the Court and Legislature Dialogue15 cited
  • 2022Public Support for Canadian Courts: Understanding the Roles of Institutional Trust and Partisanship14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work